Bioeffects of Gradient Magnetic Fields

Bioeffects of Gradient Magnetic Fields
During MR procedures, gradient or time-varying magnetic fields may stimulate nerves or muscles in patients by inducing electrical fields. This topic has been thoroughly reviewed by Schaefer et al., Nyenhuis et al., Bourland et al., and Bencsik et al. The potential for interactions between gradient magnetic fields and biologic tissue is dependent on a variety of factors including the fundamental field frequency, the maximum flux density, the average flux density, the presence of harmonic frequencies, the waveform characteristics of the signal, the polarity of the signal, the current distribution in the body, the electrical properties, and the sensitivity of the cell membrane.

GRADIENT MAGNETIC FIELD-INDUCED STIMULATION
Several investigations have characterized MR system-related, gradient magnetic field-induced stimulation in human subjects. At sufficient exposure levels, peripheral nerve stimulation is perceptible as “tingling” or “tapping” sensations. At gradient magnetic field exposure levels from 50% to 100% above perception thresholds, patients may become uncomfortable or experience pain. At extremely high levels, cardiac stimulation is a concern. However, the induction of cardiac stimulation requires exceedingly large gradient fields that are more than an order of magnitude greater than those used currently by commercially available MR systems.

With regard to gradient magnetic fields, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration considers that MR procedures using rates of change (dB/dt) sufficient to produce severe discomfort or painful nerve stimulation a significant risk. These safety standards for gradient magnetic fields associated with present-day MR systems appear to adequately protect patients from potential hazards or injuries.

Interestingly, studies performed in human subjects have indicated that anatomical sites of peripheral nerve stimulation vary depending on the activation of a specific gradient (i.e., x-, y- or, z-gradient). For example, stimulation sites for x-gradients included the bridge of the nose, left side of the thorax, iliac crest, left thigh, buttocks, and the lower back. Stimulation sites for y-gradients included the scapula, upper arms, shoulder, right side of the thorax, iliac crest, hip, hands, and upper back. Stimulation sites for z-gradients included the scapula, thorax, xyphoid, abdomen, iliac crest, and upper and lower back. Peripheral nerve stimulation sites were typically found at bony prominences. According to Schaefer et al., since bone is less conductive than the surrounding tissue, it may increase current densities in narrow regions of tissue between the bone and the skin, resulting in lower nerve stimulation thresholds than expected.

REFERENCES
Abart J, Eberhardt K, Fischer H, et al. Peripheral nerve stimulation by time-varying magnetic fields. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1997; 21:532–538.

Bencsik M, Bowtell R, Bowley R. Electric fields induced in the human body by time-varying magnetic field gradients in MRI: numerical calculations and correlation analysis. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:2337-53.

Bourland JD, Nyenhuis JA, Schaefer DJ. Physiologic effects of intense MRI gradient fields. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 1999; 9:363–377.

Budinger TF, Fischer H, Hentshel D, Reinflder HE, Schmitt F. Physiological effects of fast oscillating magnetic field gradients. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1991;15:609–614.

Cohen MS, Weisskoff R, Kantor H. Sensory stimulation by time varying magnetic fields. Magn Reson 1990;14:409–414.

de Vocht F, Liket L, De Vocht A, Mistry T, Glover P, Gowland P, Kromhout H. Exposure to alternating electromagnetic fields and effects on the visual and visuomotor systems. Br J Radiol. 2007;80:822-8.

Doherty J, Whitman G, Robinson M, et al. Changes in cardiac excitability and vulnerability in NMR fields. 1985;20:129-135.

Ehrhardt JC, Lin CS, Magnotta VA, Fisher DJ, Yuh WTC. Peripheral nerve stimulation in a whole-body echo-planar imaging system. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:405–409.

Fuentes MA, Trakic A, Wilson SJ, Crozier S. Analysis and measurements of magnetic field exposures for healthcare workers in selected MR environments. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55:1355-64.

Glover PM, Eldeghaidy S, Mistry TR, Gowland PA. Measurement of visual evoked potential during and after periods of pulsed magnetic field exposure. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:1353-6.

Ham CLG, Engels JML, van de Weil GT, Machielsen A. Peripheral nerve stimulation during MRI: effects of high gradient amplitudes and switching rates. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:933–937.

Hartwig V, Giovannetti G, et al. Biological effects and safety in magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6:1778-98.

Irnich W, Schmitt F. Magnetostimulation in MRI. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:619–623.

International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Statement, Medical magnetic resonance procedures: protection of patients. Health Physics 2004;87:197-216.

Kannala S, et al. Occupational exposure measurements of static and pulsed gradient magnetic fields in the vicinity of MRI scanners. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:2243-57.

Kangarlu A, Tang L, Ibrahim TS. Electric field measurements and computational modeling at ultrahigh-field MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:1222-1226.

King KF, Schaefer DJ. Spiral scan peripheral nerve stimulation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:164-170.

Li Y, Hand JW, Wills T, Hajnal JV. Numerically-simulated induced electric field and current density within a human model located close to a z-gradient coil. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:1286-95.

Mansfield P, Harvey PR. Limits to neural stimulation in echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 1993; 29:746–758.

Nyenhuis JA, Bourland J, Kildishev AV, Schaefer DJ. Health effects and safety of intense gradient fields. In: Shellock FG, ed. Magnetic resonance procedures: health effects and safety. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2001; 31-54.

Nyenhuis JA, Bourland JD, Schaefer DJ. Analysis from a stimulation perspective of magnetic field patterns of MR gradient coils. J Appl Phys 1997;81:4314–4316.

Schaefer DJ, Bourland JD, Nyenhuis JA. Review of patient safety in time-varying gradient fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:20-29.

Schwenzer NF, Bantleon R, et al. Do static or time-varying magnetic fields in magnetic resonance imaging (3.0 T) alter protein-gene expression? A study on human embryonic lung fibroblasts. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:1210-5.

Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology, 2004;232:635-652.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. Criteria for Significant Risk Investigations of Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Devices, July 14, 2003.

Vogt FM, Ladd ME, Hunold P, Mateiescu S, Hebrank FX, Zhang A, Debatin JF, Gohde SC. Increased time rate of change of gradient fields: Effect on peripheral nerve stimulation at clinical MR imaging. Radiology 2004;233:548-554.

Weintraub MI, Khoury A, Cole SP. Biologic effects of 3 Tesla (T) MR imaging comparing traditional 1.5-T and 0.6-T in 1,023 consecutive outpatients. J Neuroimaging. 2007;17:241-5