Default.asp?T_MRI_DOC_LISTPage=8&LSub=48
 mri_brain_scan
 Default.asp
 GenPg.asp?pgname=Disclaimer
 TheList_search.asp
 SafetyInfog.asp
 GenPg.asp?pgname=ScreeningForm
 GenPg.asp?pgname=ProductTesting
 GenPg.asp?pgname=OrderingBooks
 GenPg.asp?pgname=Lectures
 GenPg.asp?pgname=AboutDrShellock
 PriorityEmail.asp
 
 mri_brain_scan
 

                                            Safety Information Article
                      Information on this page is limited by the terms of our Disclaimer.  Please Read!

      Penile Implants 

Several types of penile implants and prostheses have been evaluated for magnetic field interactions associated with MR systems. Of these, two (i.e., the Duraphase and Omniphase models) demonstrated substantial ferromagnetic qualities when exposed to a 1.5-Tesla MR system. 

Fortunately, it is unlikely for a penile implant to severely injure a patient undergoing an MR procedure because of the degree of magnetic field interactions associated with the 1.5-Tesla MR system. This is especially true when one considers the manner in which this device is utilized.

Nevertheless, it would be uncomfortable for a patient with a ferromagnetic penile implant to undergo an MR examination. For this reason, subjecting a patient with the Duraphase or Omniphase penile implant to the MR environment or an MR procedure is inadvisable.

MRI Information at 3-Tesla and Penile Implants. 
MRI at 3-Tesla and Penile Implants. Several different penile implants have been tested in association with 3-Tesla MR systems. Findings for these specific penile implants indicated that they either exhibited no magnetic field interactions or relatively minor or “weak” magnetic field interactions. Accordingly, these specific penile implants are considered acceptable for patients undergoing MR procedures using MR systems operating at 3-Tesla or less and according to the MR conditional labeling (see The List).

REFERENCES
Lowe G, et al. A catalog of magnetic resonance imaging compatibility of penile prostheses. J Sex Med. 2012;9:1482-1487.

Shellock FG, Crues JV, Editors. MRI Bioeffects, Safety, and Patient Management. Biomedical Research Publishing Group, Los Angeles, CA, 2014.

Shellock FG, Crues JV, Sacks SA. High-field magnetic resonance imaging of penile prostheses: in vitro evaluation of deflection forces and imaging artifacts [Abstract]. In: Book of Abstracts, Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, CA: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1987;3:915.



_____________________________________________________________________________________
  (c) 2017 by Shellock R & D Services, Inc. and Frank G. Shellock, Ph.D. All Rights Reserved. All copyrights and pertinent trademarks are owned by Shellock R & D Services, Inc. and Frank G. Shellock, Ph.D. No part of the MRISAFETY.COM web site may be reproduced, stored in any retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, physical, electronic or otherwise, without the prior written permission of Shellock R & D Services, Inc. or Frank G. Shellock, Ph. D. Request for permission to reproduce any information contained on the MRISAFETY.COM web site should be addressed to: frank.shellock@gte.net
Be sure to read our Disclaimer.